Ram Jeevan Bhagat v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Review No.217 of 2015 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 10161 of 2015 =========================================================== Ram Jeevan Bhagat Son of Late Baiju Bhagat Resident of Village - Lakhnouri, P.S. Paroo, District - Muzaffarpur .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

3. District Magistrate - Cum - Collector, Madhubani, District Madhubani

4. Anchal Adhikari Pandaul, District - Madhubani .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. S.K. Jha, G.P.3 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 07-12-2016 Subsequent discovery on new pleadings will not make the previous order of the learned Single Judge amenable to review jurisdiction. On a pointed question put before the counsel for the petitioner whether Annexure-4 was part and parcel of the record and pleading in the writ application, he says it is a subsequent discovery. If that be so, the impugned order dated 27.07.2015, passed in CWJC No.10161 of 2015 cannot be reviewed. Review application is dismissed.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.) S.Kumar/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 09.12.2016 Transmission Date NA