Patna High CourtCR. MISC./11770/2017dismissed

Golden Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2017-07-17Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.11770 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -351 Year- 2016 Thana -DALSINGHSARAI District- SAMASTIPUR ======================================================

1. Golden Kumar Son of Praveen Kumar Singh, Resident of VillageMukhtiarpur, Police Station- Bhagwanpur, District- Begusarai. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Upendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 17-07-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Dalsignsarai P.S. Case No. 351 of 2016, registered for offences punishable under Sections 302, 394 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

Allegation is of killing the brother of the informant. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that save and except his own confessional statement, there is nothing against the petitioner. Further petitioner has not been named in the F.I.R and informant has not named this petitioner rather he has named others. It has also been submitted that other co-accused persons have also been arrested in this case and petitioner confessed his guilt due to high handedness of the police. Petitioner has been in judicial custody since 05.12.2016 and so far criminal

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.11770 of 2017 (5) dt.17-07-2017 2/2 antecedents of the petitioner is concerned, he has been remanded in all those cases after arrest in this case. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of allegation as well as the fact that he is accused in three other cases, as such, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail, his application for regular bail is, accordingly, rejected.

However, a submission has been made that in this case charge has been made, as such, the trial court is directed to expedite the trial and try to conclude it within a period of one year. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T