Ramesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49519 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-48 Year-2019 Thana- PIPRA District- Supaul ====================================================== 1.

RAMESH KUMAR Son of Late Satto Yadav, Resident of Village-Rampur Bela Tola, P.S.-Pipra, District-Supaul.

2.

Mahesh Kumar @ Kaila Son of Late Satto Yadav, Resident of VillageRampur Bela Tola, P.S.-Pipra, District-Supaul. 3.

Ganesh Yadav Son of Late Satto Yadav, Resident of Village-Rampur Bela Tola, P.S.-Pipra, District-Supaul.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Amrit Abhijat For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Aditya Narayan Singh.1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 08-08-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

In this case, the petitioners are seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Pipra P.S. Case No. 48 of 2019 registered for offence punishable under sections 307, 341, 342, 323, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

In this case, the petitioner submits that after 63 days, the case has been instituted before the police. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer for bail of the petitioners is allowed and they, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within six

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49519 of 2019(2) dt.08-08-2019 2/2 weeks from today, are directed to be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-VI, Supaul in connection with Pipra P.S. Case No. 48 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438 Cr. PC and also subject to the condition that one of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court. The petitioners will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence. The petitioners shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make themselves available as and when required by the court.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) Mahesh/- U T