Parshuram Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64572 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-154 Year-2021 Thana- SIMRI District- Buxar ====================================================== 1.

PARSHURAM YADAV Son of Gorakh Yadav Resident of Village - Badka Singhanpura, P.S.- Simari, District - Buxar.

2.

Madan Yadav Son of Lalsaheb Yadav Resident of Village - Badka Singhanpura, P.S.- Simari, District - Buxar.

3.

Pradeep Yadav Son of Lalsaheb Yadav Resident of Village - Badka Singhanpura, P.S.- Simari, District - Buxar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Harendra Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Jitendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 25-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 325, 307, 354(a), 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation against the petitioners is of assaulting and threatening the informant's side.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. They have been falsely implicated in this case. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64572 of 2021(3) dt.25-07-2022 2/2 allegation leveled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. It is submitted that for the alleged occurrence, there is a case and counter-case between the parties and both sides have sustained injuries, which are simple in nature. It is submitted that both sides are agnates and there is also a land dispute between the parties. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, since the injuries are simple in nature and there is case and counter-case between the parties, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Simari (Buxar) P.S. Case No.154/2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) pallavi/- U T