Ajit Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60647 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-199 Year-2024 Thana- RAFIGANJ District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Ajit Kumar Yadav Son Of Rajendra Ydav R/V- Vilalge- Kapur Bigha, At Present Krantinagar Rafiganj, P.S.- Rafiganj, Distt.- Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Bhaskar Shankar, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. J.N. Thakur, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 02-09-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 307, 323, 341, 379, 120(b)/34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. As per allegation in the FIR, over a money dispute, several accused persons including the petitioner alleged to have assaulted the informant. FIR named accused persons were ambushed and on seeing the informant, co-accused Sujit Kumar Yadav fired three rounds from his pistol which hit the chest, stomach and hand of the informant and accused Saurabh Kumar @ Bholi snatched golden chain and Rs. 2,00,000/- from the informant.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60647 of 2024(2) dt.02-09-2024 2/2 that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. Specific allegation of firing is against co-accused Sujit Kumar Yadav and not against the petitioner. Even he is not amongst the four accused persons, who surrounded the informant at the time of occurrence. Petitioner is allegedly said to be a liner in the present case. No incriminating articles were recovered from his conscious possession. He has got no criminal antecedent and languishing in judicial custody since 19.5.2024.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that petitioner is a man of clean antecedent, this court is inclined to enlarge him on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-IV, Aurangabad in connection with Rafiganj P.S. Case No. 199 of 2024, subject to the condition that petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and be available as and when required by he court. (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) sushma/- U