Iliyas Alam v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.22962 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-301 Year-2015 Thana- TURKAULIYA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Iliyas Alam, Son of Amanul Haque, Resident of Village-Siswa, P.S. Banjariya, District-East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Sevak Choudhary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 03-05-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Turkauliya (Banjariya) P.S. Case No. 301 of 2015 registered for offences under sections 420 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 135 of the Electricity Act. As per allegation made in the First Information Report, on 13.4.2015 at 11.25 AM, a telephonic information was received of break down, when the matter was verified, it was found that the rural feeder has been connected with the urban feeder which led to lodging of the present criminal case. There is nothing on record to show that the petitioner was directly involved in the allegation made in the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.22962 of 2018(3) dt.03-05-2018 2/2 First Information Report.

Looking to the entire facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, namely, Iliyas Alam, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Turkauliya (Banjariya) P.S. Case No. 301 of 2015, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. as also subject to condition that whenever the police will call the petitioner for investigation/interrogation, he will remain present and if he would not present himself, the privilege of grant of anticipatory bail shall be deemed to have been cancelled.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) rishi/- U T