Patna High CourtCR. MISC./4707/2017bail granted

Dhruv Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

2017-02-14Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.4707 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -306 Year- 2016 Thana -GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. DistrictSARAN ====================================================== Dhruv Mahto, Son of Deonath Mahto, resident of village-Nawaji Tola, Dharmshala, P.S.- Rivilganj, District- Saran at Chapra. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Dewendra Narayan Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Anil Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 14-02-2017 This is an application for grant of bail for offences punishable under Sections 30 (A) of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that allegation against petitioner is that recovery of 5 litres of Mahua wine was made. He is in custody for about three months and has got no criminal antecedent.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the fact that petitioner has remained in custody for about three months, let above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty-five thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra in connection with Saran

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.4707 of 2017 (2) dt.14-02-2017 2/2 Excise Case no. 306 of 2016 with the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned. (ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sudip/- U T