Shashikant Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.2728 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -364 Year- 2016 Thana -BEGUSARAI MUFFASIL DistrictBEGUSARAI ====================================================== Shashikant Singh, son of Mohan Prasad Singh, Resident of Village- Sanha Naga Tola, P.S. Sahebpur Kamal, District- Begusarai. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Binod Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Parmanand Prasad (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 28-01-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Begusarai (Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 364 of 2016, registered for the offence punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegedly, two persons came on a motorcycle and takeover the informant and stopped his motorcycle. As soon as the informant stopped the vehicle the miscreants pointed out the gun and snatched purse and mobile from his pocket and fled away towards Ballia. In the purse, there was Rs. 500/-, ATM , driving license and some important papers. The name of the petitioner transpired in the statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. of Anjani Kuamr the father of co-accused Golu Kumar @ Abhishek that the petitioner and Chandan Kumar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2728 of 2017 (2) dt.28-01-2017 2/2 used to live with his son Golu Kumar @ Abhishek Kumar who is using the SIM in the looted mobile.

Submission is of false implication and that there is no legal and tangible material against the petitioner, from the statement recorded under section 164 Cr.P.C. it does not transpire that the petitioner was involved in the crime but the petitioner is being searched on that basis only, as such, the petitioner deserves sympathetic consideration.

The learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer of pre-arrest bail.

In the facts and circumstances as stated above, the petitioner in the event of his arrest or surrender within four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai, in connection with Begusarai (Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 364 of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down in section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J.) Rajiv/- U T