Bablu Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 54149 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-174 Year-2022 Thana- SHERGHATI District- Gaya ====================================================== BABLU CHAUDHARY Son of Babulal Chaudhary Resident of Village - Lahuari, P.S.- Dhangai, District - Gaya.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Md. Jubair Ansari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Yogendra Kumar, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 04-01-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 10.03.2022 and has antecedent of one case.
The informant alleges that two unknown miscreants on 1.03.2022, looted Rs. 1,17,300/- along with other articles as detailed in the FIR.
Learned counsel next submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case, it is next submitted that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 54149 of 2022(2) dt.04-01-2023 2/2 FIR was against unknown, on query of the Court as to how the name of the petitioner transpired in the case to which the learned counsel submits that he has no instructions on the issue. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that from perusal of the impugned order it would manifest that out of the looted money Rs. 3000/- was recovered from the house of the petitioner.
Considering the submission made by the learned A.P.P., the Court is inclined to release the petitioner on bail. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) GauravSinha/- U T