Patna High CourtCR. MISC./4089/2017rejected

Manish Kumar @ Manish Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2017-04-19Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.4089 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -394 Year- 2014 Thana -TEGHRA District- BEGUSARAI ====================================================== Manish Kumar @ Manish Singh, Son of Late Bir Bahadur Singh, Resident of Village- Barauni, P.S. Teghra, District- Begusarai. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sandip Kumar Gautam For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Parmeshwar Mehta ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 19-04-2017 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned A.P.P for the State as also the learned counsel for the Informant.

The petitioner wants to renew his prayer for bail which was earlier rejected by order dated 01.12.2015 in Cr. Misc. No. 30812 of 2015, on the ground that the petitioner is in custody since 30.01.2015, there is no specific allegation as to who fired causing injury to the informant, the manner of occurrence as alleged is not true version, there is land dispute, out of ten charge sheeted witnesses eight witnesses have been examined and as such the petitioner deserves sympathetic consideration. The learned A.P.P. duly assisted by the learned counsel for the informant opposes prayer for bail of the petitioner

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.4089 of 2017 (3) dt.19-04-2017 2/2 by submitting that the petitioner is also one of the assailants. In the facts and circumstances as stated above, finding no good ground for reconsideration of prayer for bail, again prayer for bail of the petitioner stands rejected in connection with Sessions Trial No. 522 of 2015 arising out of Teghra P.S. Case No. 394 of 2014 pending in the court of Sessions Judge, Begusarai.

However, considering detention of the petitioner, let the trial be expedited and concluded as early as possible preferably within a period of four months.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) Abhay/- U T