Sakuni Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.46480 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -385 Year- 2016 Thana -HAJIPUR District- VAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ====================================================== Sakuni Devi Wife of Harendra Sah Resident of Village-Repura math, P.S.- Lalganj, District-Vaishali .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mrs. Bela Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anand Kishore Choudhary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 10-01-2017 Heard both sides.
The petitioner apprehends her arrest in Hajipur Town P.S. Case No. 385/2016, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 366A, 120B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The informant filed complaint petition alleging therein that her minor daughter aged about 14 years was kidnapped. On 26.05.2016 her daughter received a call and thereafter she left her house. The informant informed the police and alleged that the petitioner and others kidnapped his daughter. On the basis of complaint petition filed by the informant the present F.I.R. was lodged.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is maternal aunt of Sujit Kumar. Petitioner has no manner of
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46480 of 2016 (3) dt.10-01-2017 2/2 concern with the family affairs of Sujit Kumar. Petitioner has falsely been implicated in the case. On the date of occurrence itself the informant knew about the kidnapping, but the informant filed complaint case at a belated stage and on the next day the victim was recovered, but from perusal of the statement of the victim itself, it appears that it was the petitioner, who called the victim to her house, forced her to take egg and thereafter the victim became unconscious. The victim was taken to different places. Considering the facts aforesaid and the fact that victim herself made specific allegation against the petitioner abovenamed, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the same is rejected.
(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J.) Vinita/- U T