Ramjee Yadav And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.12746 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -174 Year- 2017 Thana -KARAKAT District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================
1. Ramjee Yadav,
2. Lakshuman Yadav @ Lachhman Yadav, Both sons of Bhaiya Ram Yadav,
3. Anurag Yadav, Son of Ramjee Yadav, All residents of Village Dahiyari, P.S Karakat, District- Rohtas. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sada Nand Roy, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 09-03-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.
The petitioners apprehend their arrest in Karakat P.S. Case No. 174 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 379, 307, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged in the written report that petitioners were carrying sand and on protest, they assaulted the informant and also snatched Golden chain . It is further alleged that on call when his brother reached, the petitioners also assaulted him. The learned Sessions Judge has mentioned in the impugned order about the injury report of the injured from which it appears that simple injury has been sustained by them.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12746 of 2018 (2) dt.09-03-2018 2/2 Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioners, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Karakat P.S. Case No. 174 of 2017, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sasaram, Distt. Rohtas, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C.
with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and their absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel their bail bond and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.
(Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T