Patna High CourtCR. MISC./4657/2017bail granted

Rajesh Yadav @ Rajesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2017-02-20Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.4657 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -135 Year- 2016 Thana -WARSALIGANJ District- NAWADA ======================================================

1. Rajesh Yadav @ Rajesh Kumar, Son of ram Bilas Yadav, Resident of Village-Harish Chandan Bigha, P.S. Muffasil, District-Nawada .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Dr. Alok Kumar Alok Mr. Pramod Kumar Verma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Indra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 20-02-2017 Heard the parties.

This application has been filed in connection Warisalignaj P.S.Case No.135 of 2016 for the offence under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that except the confessional statement, there is nothing against the petitioner and though it is alleged that there is recovery of 'bracelet' but that has not been put on T.I.P. and the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody for more than five months. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the fact that except the confessional statement, there is nothing against the petitioner and he is in custody for more than five months, let the petitioner,

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.4657 of 2017 (3) dt.20-02-2017 2/2 above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Nawada in connection with Warisaliganj P.S.Case No.135 of 2016.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U