Patna High CourtCR. MISC./1770/2017bail granted

Raj Kishor Patel @ Langra v. The State Of Bihar

2017-01-19Mr. Justice Rajendra Kumar Mishra2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1770 of 2017 (2) dt.19-01-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.1770 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -550 Year- 2015 Thana -HILSA District- NALANDA (BIHARSHARIFF) ====================================================== Raj Kishor Patel @ Langra, son of late Ganga Prasad. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Bhanu Pratap Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 19-01-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner is accused in connection with Hilsa P.S. Case No. 550 of 2015 registered under Sections 399 and 402 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it would appear from the F.I.R. that four persons were apprehended by the police with arms and ammunitions, who disclosed the name of this petitioner as their associate, except that there is nothing against the petitioner showing his involvement in the present case. It is further submitted that while the petitioner is accused in seven other cases, but in all cases, he is on bail and in the present case, he is in custody since 05.11.2016.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1770 of 2017 (2) dt.19-01-2017 Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hilsa, Nalanda, in connection with Hilsa P.S. Case No. 550 of 2015. Out of two sureties, one surety must be the close relative of the petitioner. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Bhardwaj/- U T