Rahul Giri @ Rahul Kumar Giri v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.2818 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -124 Year- 2016 Thana -MAIRWA District- SIWAN ====================================================== Rahul Giri @ Rahul Kumar Giri, son of Shiv Dayal Giri, Resident of Village Bharauli, Atwa Tola, P.S. Mairwa, District Siwan .... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance:
For the Petitioner : Mr. Dhramveer, Advocate For the Opposite Party : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 25-01-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner who is in custody since 27.07.2016 has renewed his prayer for bail in connection with Mairwa P.S. Case No. 124 of 2016 for the offences alleged under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 47, 53(B) and 53(C) of the Bihar Excise (Amendment) Act, 2016 having earlier been rejected by this Court by order dated 04.10.2016 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 41464 of 2016.
3. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances as well as the period of custody already suffered by the petitioner, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan in connection with Mairwa P.S. Case No. 124 of 2016 on the following conditions - (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.
(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2818 of 2017 (2) dt.25-01-2017 offence till conclusion of the trial.
(iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/BT U T