Ringu Kumari v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11678 of 2024 ====================================================== Ringu Kumari Daughter of Raghwandra Kumar Resident of village- Shrivar, P.s.- Naubatpur, Dist.- Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Health Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Additional Chief Secretary, Health Department, Government of Bihar. 3.
The Principal Secretary, General Administrative Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
4.
The State Drug Controller, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 5.
The Chairman, Bihar Public Service Commission, Patna. 6.
The Examination Controller, Bihar Public Service Commission, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Nagendra Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Standing Counsel 18 For the B.P.S.C.
:
Mr. Sanjay Pandey, Advocate Mr. Nishant Kumar Jha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 06-08-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the Bihar Public Service Commission.
2. The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the result of Drug Inspector published on 27.06.2024 in pursuant to advertisement No. 09 of 2022, as the said result has been published contrary to the rule and regulation of General Administrative Department on the basis of financial year 2021-22, notification No. 2622, dated 26.02.2019. Counsel for the petitioner seeks further direction from this Court to
Patna High Court CWJC No.11678 of 2024(2) dt.06-08-2024 2/2 publish the result afresh relating to advertisement No. 09 of 2022, particularly, with regard to candidates of Economic Weaker Section (Female) category.
3. Counsel for the petitioner submits that for his grievance he has filed representation vide Annexure- P/10 on 28.06.2024, but no decision has been taken by the Bihar Public Service Commission.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Bihar Public Service Commission may be directed to take a decision on the representation filed by the petitioner.
5. Learned counsel for State submits that it is a confrontation directly between the petitioner and the Bihar Public Service Commission, at this juncture State has no role.
6. In this view of the matter, this writ petition is disposed off directing the Bihar Public Service Commission to take a decision on the representation filed by the petitioner, which is Annexure- P/10, by speaking and reasoned order within four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order along with representation.
(Dr. Anshuman, J.) Mkr./Aman/- U