Dr. Manindra Chaudhary @ Dr. Manindra Kumar @ Chetan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.7080 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -520 Year- 2016 Thana -CHAPRA TOWN District- SARAN ====================================================== Dr. Manindra Chaudhary @ Dr. Manindra Kumar @ Chetan, son of Om Prakash Chaudhary, resident of village - Goriyakothi Bujurg, Police Station - Goriyakothi, District - Siwan.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Tiwary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Bachan Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 21-02-2017 This is an application for bail in connection with Chapra Town P.S.Case No. 520 of 2016 for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 468, 469, 470, 471, 120B, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is a Doctor and is running a Nurse Training Centre in the Chapra town and there is no chit of paper to connect the petitioner with the offence alleged. It has also been submitted that petitioner is collecting fees and he had hot talk with the students as such, he has been falsely implicated in this case and he is in custody for three months.

Heard learned APP also, who has opposed the prayer for bail stating that there is allegation against the petitioner that he

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.7080 of 2017 (2) dt.21-02-2017 2/2 has taken money for preparation of visa and other papers and that paper had been sent to Singapur but the visa and other papers were found to be forged and they had returned to Chennai and for that the informant and others suffered a loss.

In view of the fact that the allegation has supported the offence alleged, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. However, petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge in this case before the court below itself, who will consider the prayer of the petitioner without being prejudiced by this order on the basis of the materials available before him.

Accordingly, this application is dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U