← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/12595/2024disposed

Umesh Prasad Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2024-08-27Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12595 of 2024 ====================================================== Umesh Prasad Singh Son of Upendra Prasad Singh, Resident of Ward No. 3, Village- Bandiha, P.O.- Raniparti Karian, Police Station- Rosera, DistrictSamastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar.

2.

The District Magistrate, Samastipur.

3.

The Additional Collector, Samastipur.

4.

The Sub Divisional Officer, Rosera, Samastipur. 5.

The Circle Officer, Shivaji Nagar, Samastipur. 6.

The Chairman, Bihar Religious Trust Board, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pramod Kumar, Adv.

For the State :

Mr.Sudama Kumar, AC to SC-12 For the Trust Board :

Mr.Ganpati Trivedi, Sr. Adv.

Mr.Ritik Shah, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 27-08-2024

1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief(s):- "1. That this is an application for issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus, commanding and directing the Respondent authorities, specially Respondent No. 4 i.e. the Sub Divisional Officer, Rosera and Respondent No. 5 i.e. the Circle Officer, Shivaji Nagar to take all lawful action for removal of the encroachment made on the public land total measuring about 28 Bigha, 25 Katha and 10 Dhur pertaining to Khata No. 324, Mauza- Karian, Anchal- Shivaji Nagar, District- Samastipur by some

Patna High Court CWJC No.12595 of 2024(2) dt.27-08-2024 2/2 of the anti social persons without any authority of law.

And further to take all needful legal action for removal of illegal encroachment pursuant to the direction of the District Magistrate, Samastipur issued Vide an order dated 26/8/2021 passed in Complaint Appeal Proceeding."

2. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law, for redressal of his aforesaid grievances. Liberty so sought is granted.

3. The writ petition stands disposed off.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) sonal/- U