← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/9067/2010dfd for non appearance

Sudhir Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-03-13Mr. Justice Birendra Prasad Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9067 of 2010 ======================================================

1. Sudhir Kumar, S/O Sri Gaya Prasad Singh, R/O Saket Vihar M.M.Colony Anishabad, P.S-Gardanibagh In The District- Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar Through Its Secretary, Department Of Health, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. Null Null

2. The Executive Director, State Health Society, Pariwar Kalyan Bhawan,Sheikhpura,Patna.

3. The Incharge Malariya / Falariya Division, State Health Society, Govt. of Bihar,Patna.

4. The Civil Surgeon,Banka.

5. The Civil Surgeon,Begusarai.

6. The Civil Surgeon,Bettiah.

7. The Civil Surgeon,Bhagalpur.

8. The Civil Surgeon,Darbhanga.

9. The Civil Surgeon,Jehanabad.

10. The Civil Surgeon,Jamui.

11. The Civil Surgeon,Katihar.

12. The Civil Surgeon,Kaimur.

13. The Civil Surgeon,Lakhisarai.

14. The Civil Surgeon,Madhepura.

15. The Civil Surgeon,Madhubani.

16. The Civil Surgeon,Motihari.

17. The Civil Surgeon,Munger.

18. The Civil Surgeon,Muzaffarpur.

19. The Civil Surgeon,Saharsa,

20. The Civil Surgeon,Saran.

21. The Civil Surgeon,Sasaram.

22. The Civil Surgeon,Sheikhpura.

23. The Civil Surgeon,Sheohar.

24. The Civil Surgeon,Sitamarhi

25. The Civil Surgeon,Siwan.

26. The Civil Surgeon,Supaul.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : None.

For the Respondent/s : Mr. Devendra Kumar Sinha, AAG-2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER 13-03-2015 Despite repeated calls, none appears on behalf of the petitioner in support of the present writ petition. However, learned Additional Advocate General-2 appearing on behalf of the

Patna High Court CWJC No.9067 of 2010 (3) dt.13-03-2015 2/2 respondents, by referring to the averments made in the counteraffidavits filed on behalf of the different respondents, submits that in the factual matrix of the case, the petitioner cannot be granted relief in the present proceeding.

Be that as it may, the writ petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution.

(Birendra Prasad Verma, J) BTiwary/- U