Umacharan Vyadha @ Umacharan Byadha v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54270 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-121 Year-2022 Thana- KORHA District- Katihar ====================================================== UMACHARAN VYADHA @ UMACHARAN BYADHA Son of Late Fanit Lal Vyadha R/V- Bansgarha, P.S- Korha, Dist- Katihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Raghvendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shyam Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 04-01-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to make rectification in Para-3 of the regular bail application. Permission is accorded.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 304(B), 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody since 19.04.2022 and has antecedent of one case and the informant alleges that his younger daughter was married to Chhotu Vyadha, it is next alleged that on 13.03.2022 Chhotu Vyadha had come to his matrimonial home where he gave Rs. 100/- to his younger daughter who had gone outside to eat and when she came she saw that the dead body of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54270 of 2022(2) dt.04-01-2023 2/2 her sister was found hanging and Chhotu Vyadha was not present at the place of occurrence.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case, it is next submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that the entire allegation is against Chhotu Vyadha and the death even took place in the parental house of the deceased and the present petitioner who is fatherin-law of the deceased was not even present and the husband is in custody.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

Considering the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Korha P.S. Case No. 121 of 2022.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Shivam/- U T