Ajit @ Ajit Ram @ Ajit Kumar Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64171 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-137 Year-2021 Thana- BIHPUR District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== AJIT @ AJIT RAM @ AJIT KUMAR RAM Son of Ghanshyam Ram Resident of Village - Dayalpur, P.S.- Bihpur (Jhandapur), Distt.- Bhagalpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Amrendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anand Mohan Prasad Mehta, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 19-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 337, 307, 379, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that the petitioner along with Raghunath and other accused persons came and started abusing the informant, it is next alleged that the accused person even threatened the informant to withdraw the cases lodged against them, it is next alleged that Ghanshyam Ram assaulted the informant with iron rod causing injury on his forehead while petitioner assaulted with lathi, it is next alleged that rest of the accused persons started pelting stones and even snatched mobile and Rs. 500/- of the informant.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64171 of 2021(2) dt.19-07-2022 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case on account of general and omnibus allegation of assault, it is next submitted that though it is alleged that petitioner assaulted by lathi but the FIR is completely silent as to whether the informant was assaulted. It is next submitted that in the case diary there is no injury report of the informant.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the fact that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Bihpur (Jhandapur) P.S. Case No. 137 of 2021 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Shivam/- U T