Patna High CourtCR. MISC./56850/2024dismissed

Mausam Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2025-01-31Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56850 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2 Year-2022 Thana- NADI P.S. District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Mausam Yadav Son Of Late Subodh Yadav @ Late Subodh Prasad Yadav Village- Bhawanpura, Ps- Kharik (Wrongly Written P.S. Nadi In F.I.R. ), DistBhagalpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dilip Kumar, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Pawan Kumar Chaurasia, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 31-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. This is the second attempt for prayer of bail for the petitioner.

3. The following order was passed on 30.08.2023 in Cr. Misc. No. 56517 of 2023:- Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor.

2. Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within a period of four weeks from today.

3. This application is filed for grant of regular bail in connection with Nadi P.S. Case No. 02 of 2022 (S.T. No. 754 of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56850 of 2024(3) dt.31-01-2025 2/2 2022) registered under 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is involved in killing of the deceased. He has 12 antecedent of serious nature. Petitioner is in custody since 17/11/2022.

5. Learned A.P.P. has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.

6. Considering the nature of allegation levelled against the petitioner and antecedents of serious nature, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Accordingly, this application is dismissed.

4. In the trial, five witnesses out of seven witnesses have already been examined.

5. The trial is on the verge of completion, no ground for review of the earlier order is made out. This application is dismissed.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) kiran/- U T