← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/1834/2022disposed

Anju Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

2026-05-05Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1834 of 2022 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7931 of 2021 ====================================================== Anju Kumari W/o Vivek Kumar Permanent resident of Village and P.O. Teghra, P.S. - Babubarhi, District- Madhubani, presently posted as Technical Advisor to Supdt Engineer, P.H.E.D. Muzaffarpur, District- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Bihar.

2.

Jitendra Srivastava, the Principal Secretary, Department of Public Health Engineering, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3.

Ashok Kumar Engineer-in-Chief cum special Secretary, Public Health Engineering Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 4.

Dr. B. Rajender, the Principal Secretary, General Administration, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

5.

Smt. Ranchna Patil, the Additional Secretary, Gen. Administration, Deptt. Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

6.

Nirmal Kumar, the Service Complaint Redressal officer, P.H.E.D. Department, Patna.

7.

Ram Anugrah Nr. Singh, the Departmental Appellate Authority, P.H.E.D. Department, Patna.

8.

Kalika Prasad presently posted as Superintending Engineer PHED Circle Sasaram.

9.

Nityanand Prasad presently posted as Joint Secretary PHED (HQ), Patna and in- Charge Supdt Engineer PHED Circle Ara.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Amarendra Narayan, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. S. Raza Ahmad (Aag 5) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 05-05-2026 Heard Mr. Amarendra Narayan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Vijay Kumar Sinha, learned State Counsel.

2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s):

Patna High Court MJC No.1834 of 2022(3) dt.05-05-2026 2/2 "for initiation of contempt proceeding against the contemnors/opposite parties for their willful disobedience of the order dated 19.05.2022 passed in CWJC No. 7931 of 2021."

3. Show cause has come on behalf of the opposite party and shows that arrears have been calculated and the disbursed.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner be granted right to agitate the matter so far as interest part is concerned.

4. Granting liberty to the petitioner to agitate the matter, if any grievance still remains, the present contempt petition stands disposed of.

(Rajiv Roy, J) Vijay Singh/- U