Govind Kumar Yogi @ Goswami v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49541 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-102 Year-2019 Thana- MADANPUR District- Aurangabad ====================================================== GOVIND KUMAR YOGI @ GOSWAMI (Male), aged about 27 years, Son of Ramashish Goswami, Resident of Village - Mahapur, P.S. - Amas, District - Gaya (BIHAR).

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mrs.Leelawati Kumari, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party :

Mr.Dilip Kumar No. 1, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 08-08-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner is languishing in custody since 10.05.2019 in a case for the offence registered under Sections 25(1-b)a and 26 of the Arms Act.

The prosecution story, in brief, is that on 10.05.2019 around 8.05 P.M., the informant received secret information about one suspicious person named Govind Kumar Yogi @ Goswami (petitioner) who is accused in Madanpur P.S. Case No. 98/2019. He proceeded from Station and around 8.25 P.M. when he reached Khariyawan More, he saw one person fleeing after seeing them and then he as the petitioner was caught by police personnels and till then crowd has gathered around in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49541 of 2019(2) dt.08-08-2019 2/2 which some were guarding. On search, from his right side of waist, one Revolver containing two live cartridges were recovered. When the informant asked for papers of these arms and ammunition, no satisfactory explanation or paper was given. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Charge sheet has been submitted in the present case. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioner. One Revolver alongwith two live cartridges is said to have been recovered from possession of the petitioner. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr. P.C. On behalf of the learned counsel for the State, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Aurangabad, in connection with Madanpur P.S. Case No. 102 of 2019.

(Sudhir Singh, J) U.K./- U T