Devendra Prasad v. The State Of Bihar Through Sri Amir Subhani

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2296 of 2023 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2251 of 2023 ====================================================== Devendra Prasad Son of Dularchand Kapsime, resident of Ramdas Pur Lane, Gosal Bagh, P.O. and P.S. Gaya, District - Gaya, the retired Professor of Post Graduate Department of Commerce, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, District - Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Sri Amir Subhani son of not known to the petitioner presently posted as the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

Sri K.K. Pathak, son of not known to the petitioner presently posted as the Additional Chief Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

Dr. Rekha Kumari, wife of not known to the petitioner presently posted as the Director, Higher Education, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4.

Dr. Shashi Pratap Shahi, son of not known to the petitioner, presently posted as the Vice Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya. 5.

Dr. Ravi Prakash, son of not known to the petitioner, presently posted as the Registrar, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya.

6.

Sri Deepak Kumar Singh, son of not known to the petitioner, presently posted as the Finance Officer, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vijay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Mukund Mohan Jha, AC to GP 27 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 12-07-2024 Heard Mr. Vijay Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Mukund Mohan Jha, learned AC to GP 27 for the State.

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner informs that though the substantial amount has been paid to the petitioner but the calculation chart has not been

Patna High Court MJC No.2296 of 2023(3) dt.12-07-2024 2/2 provided to the petitioner to substantiate as to whether the entire amount, as claimed by the petitioner, has been paid. The other grievances of the petitioner have been redressed.

3. Considering the aforesaid information that the substantial amount has been paid but the calculation chart has not been provided to the petitioner, I am of the opinion that the authority concerned must ensure to provide the calculation chart to the petitioner so that he may get satisfied.

4. With the above observation/direction, the present Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Application stands disposed of. (Purnendu Singh, J) chn/- U