Rahul Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56820 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-718 Year-2022 Thana- ROHTAS COMPLAINT CASE DistrictRohtas ====================================================== Rahul Kumar Son of Kameshwar Singh @ Kameshwar Pd. Singh R/VVillage- Turki, P.S. Agrer, Dist. Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Rajaram Singh Sonof Late Fekan Singh R/V- Village- Paisra, P.O.- Belwa, P.S.- Sasaram 9m), Distt.- Rohtas ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ajay Kumar Tiwari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Jai Narain Thakur, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. B. PD. SINGH ORAL ORDER 05-03-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Rohtas Complaint Case No. 718 of 2022 for the offence under Sections 323, 406 and 420 of the I.P.C.
3. As per the prosecution story, the informant has alleged that the petitioner has defalcated a sum of Rs. 3,00,000/- on the false promise of exchange of land.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the entire prosecution is malicious in nature, concocted, false and fabricated. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. From the bare perusal of complaint petition it appears that nowhere the details of the land as well as name of the vendor
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56820 of 2024(6) dt.05-03-2025 2/2 transpired. The petitioner is student and preparing for competitive exams. Learned counsel further submits that any Plot No., Khata No., area/boundary of alleged land is not mentioned in the complaint regarding which money was allegedly paid by the complainant in favour of petitioner. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of complainant also fails to state this fact.
5. Learned APP opposes the prayer for bail.
6. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to extend him the privilege of anticipatory bail.
7. Let the petitioner be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from the receipt of this order, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram, in connection with Rohtas Complaint Case No. 718 of 2022 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
(S. B. Pd. Singh, J) Ankit Kumar/- U T