Bibi Sohagi @ Sohagi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55957 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-13 Year-2023 Thana- JALALGARH District- Purnia ====================================================== 1.
Bibi Sohagi @ Sohagi Wife Of Md . Muslim Resident Of Village-Dihiya Gidarmari, Ps- Jalalgarh, Distt- Purnea 2.
Johanara @ Jahanara Khatoon Wife Of Md. Saheb Resident Of VillageDihiya Gidarmari, Ps- Jalalgarh, Distt- Purnea 3.
Md. Maneer @ Manir Uddin Son Of Md. Muslim Resident Of VillageDihiya Gidarmari, Ps- Jalalgarh, Distt- Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Madhav Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 14-09-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 354(B), 406, 420 and 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code pending in the learned court below.
3. As per the prosecution case, Md. Muslim took the consideration money for execution of a piece of land in favour of the informant but had not executed the sale deed in favour of the informant. It is further alleged that Md. Muslim executed the said laid in favour of his daughter thereafter all the petitioners in furtherance with their common intention all over such land and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55957 of 2023(2) dt.14-09-2023 2/3 started cultivating the said land. When the informant made protest then they started pressing his neck with intention to kill him.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners. He submits that there is no specific overt act against the petitioners. He further submits that there is case and counter case between the parties. He further submits that petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail application.
5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and the fact that there is general and omnibus allegations levelled against the petitioners, let the petitioners, named above, in the event of their arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court below, where the case is pending/Successor court, in connection with
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55957 of 2023(2) dt.14-09-2023 3/3 Jalalgarh P.S. Case No.13/2023, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) ajay/- U T