Raghuni Prasad Yadav, v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3014 of 2019 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12237 of 2018 ====================================================== Raghuni Prasad Yadav, Son of Lelhai Prasad Yadav, Resident of VillageTengaraha, P.S.- Singheshwar, District- Madhepura. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna, Sri Deepak Kumar.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna, namely Sri R.K. Mahajan. 3.

The Director (Higher Education), Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna, namely Sri Sushil Kumar.

4.

The Bhupendra Narayan Mandal University, Laloo Nagar, Madhepura through its Registrar, namely Sri Colonel Neeraj Kumar. 5.

The Vice-Chancellor, Bhupendra Narayan Mandal University, Laloo Nagar, Madhepura, namely Dr. Awadh Kishore Roy.

6.

The Registrar, Bhupendra Narayan Mandal University, Laloo Nagar, Madhepura, namely Sri Colonel Neeraj Kumar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pramod Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Jitendra Kumar Roy 1(SC-13) For B.N. Mandal University :

Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate Mr. Rajni Kant Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 03-07-2026 At the outset, the Ld. Counsel for the parties submit that the order of this Court dated 21.01.2019 passed in CWJC No. 12237 of 2018 has already stood complied with inasmuch as the Vice-Chancellor, Bhupendra Narayan Mandal University, Madhepura vide order dated 17.04.2026 has directed for absorption of the petitioner on the post of Clerk at B.N.M.V College, Sahugarh, Madhepura with effect from 12.02.1990

Patna High Court MJC No.3014 of 2019(6) dt.03-07-2026 2/2 with all consequential benefits, however it has been stated that payment shall be made after the funds are made available by the State Government.

2.

At this juncture, the Ld. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner be granted liberty to agitate his grievances with regard to payment of the consequential benefits, by taking recourse to the due process of law. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

3.

The petition stands disposed of.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U