Patna High CourtCR. MISC./14621/2017rejected

Md. Sajjad @ Shahzad v. The State Of Bihar

2017-04-19Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.14621 of 2017 (2) dt.19-04-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.14621 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -506 Year- 2015 Thana -LAKHISARAI District- LAKHISARAI ======================================================

1. Md. Sajjad @ Shahzad Son of Md. Nasir, Resident of Village- Oraiya, P.S.- Lakhisarai, District- Lakhisarai.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Mustaque Alam ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 19-04-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. representing the State.

The petitioner wants to renew his prayer of bail which was earlier twice rejected vide Criminal Misc. Nos. 5346/16 and 46111/16 by order dated 30.03.2016 and 09.11.2016 respectively by this Court on the ground that the petitioner is suffering in custody since 08.12.2015 and the trial has not been concluded as yet, up till now the victim has not been examined. From medical report, it reveals that the informant was pregnant from before the alleged date of occurrence and only with a view to put pressure, this false case has been lodged. The learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer of bail. In the facts and circumstances stated above, finding

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.14621 of 2017 (2) dt.19-04-2017 no good ground for reconsideration of prayer of bail, again the prayer of bail of the petitioner stands rejected in S.T. No. 87 of 2016 pending in the court of Additional Sessions Judge III, Lakhisarai.

However, the trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same as early as possible, preferably within three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order after taking the same on priority basis, failing which, the petitioner, if at no fault, may be at liberty to renew his prayer of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) sushma/- U