← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./57424/2022allowed

Shashi Kant Khatri @ Shashi Kant Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2022-12-20Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57424 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-85 Year-2015 Thana- GOH District- Aurangabad ====================================================== 1.

SHASHI KANT KHATRI @ SHASHI KANT KUMAR S/o Rameshwar Prasad @ Rameshwar Lal Khatri Resident of Village- Goh Uphara, Road, P.S.- Goh, District- Aurangabad (Bihar) 2.

Sri Kant Khatri @ Srikant Kumar S/o Rameshwar Prasad @ Rameshwar Lal Khatri Resident of Village- Goh Uphara, Road, P.S.- Goh, DistrictAurangabad (Bihar) 3.

Amar Kant Khatri @ Amar Kant Kumar S/o Rameshwar Prasad @ Rameshwar Lal Khatri Resident of Village- Goh Uphara, Road, P.S.- Goh, District- Aurangabad (Bihar) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mrs.Leelawati Kumari For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Kumar Veerendra Narayan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 20-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 149, 448, 341, 323, 307 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that there is there is case and counter case

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57424 of 2022(2) dt.20-12-2022 2/2 between the parties. He submits that after investigation Police has filed final form against the petitioners but learned Court below differed the final form and taken cognizance against the petitioner. He submits that informant and petitioner's father are cousin brother. He further submits that petitioners have no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Goh P.S. Case No. 85/2015, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) ajay/- U T