Anu Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.18512 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -24 Year- 2017 Thana -KOTWA DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ====================================================== Anu Thakur Son of Shiv Thakur, Resident of Village- Kotwa, P.S.- Kotwa, District- East Chmparan.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhurendra Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Parties : Sri Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 24-05-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Kotwa P.S. Case No. 24 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under sections 413 and 414 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegedly in the garage of the petitioner, one stolen motor-cycle was recovered and the same was purchased by the petitioner for Rs. 3,700/- without any paper. Submission is of false implication and that the petitioner has been made victim of the circumstances. The said motor-cycle was brought by Promod Rai in the garage of the petitioner and he expressed his intention to sell the said

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18512 of 2017 (3) dt.24-05-2017 2/2 motor-cycle and consideration amount of Rs. 30,000/- was fixed but when the petitioner demanded the paper of the said motor cycle then Pramod Rai told that the paper will be given within one week. In the meantime, Police came there and arrested the petitioner, Pramod Rai succeeded in fleeing away. Several independent witnesses have supported this version and as such, the petitioner deserves sympathetic consideration. Learned APP opposes the prayer of bail.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering that the stolen motor-cycle was recovered from the garage of the petitioner and as such, at present I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and accordingly, his such prayer stands rejected. However, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after remaining six months in custody from the date of his remand in this case.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) Mahesh/- U T