M/S The Q. S. Retail v. The Indian Overseas Bank And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3152 of 2016 =========================================================== M/s The Q. S. Retail a proprietorship firm at Ashok Raj Path, P.S Pirbahore, District- Patna through its Authorised Representative Parwaiz Qamar S/o Md. Qamruzamma resident of Ashok Raj Path, P.S. Pirbahore, District- Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Indian Overseas Bank, a Banking Company incorporated under Banking Companies (Acquisition and transfer of undertaking) Act 1970 having its Central Office 763, Anna Salai, Chennai- 600002 through its Chairman cum Managing Director.

2. The Regional Manager, Indian Overseas Bank, regional office at Naseema House, 2nd & 3rd Floor, West Gandhi Maidan, Patna 800001.

3. The Branch Manager, Indian Overseas Bank, 1st Floor, Naseema House, West Gandhi Maidan, Patna.

4. The Authorized Officer, Indian Overseas Bank, 1st Floor, Naseema House, West Gandhi Maidan, Patna.

5. The Union of India through the Presiding Officer, Debt Recovery Tribunal, Chajjubagh, Patna.

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gautam Kumar Kejriwal, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sanjay Singh Thakur, Adv. =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 28-07-2016 The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 03.11.2015 and 21.12.2015 passed in O.A. No. 124 of 2015 by the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Patna; and for other connected reliefs.

2. In course of submissions, statement is made at the bar on behalf of the petitioner that pursuant to negotiations for amicable settlement, respondent Bank has since withdrawn O.A. No. 124/2015 which has now been disposed of.

3. In that view of the matter, the present writ petition has

Patna High Court CWJC No.3152 of 2016 dt.28-07-2016 2/2 become infructuous. The same is accordingly disposed along with I.A. No. 5147 of 2016.

4. Needless to say, this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the claims of the petitioner. (Vikash Jain, J) Md. Ibrarul/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 29.07.2016 Transmission Date