Patna High CourtCR. MISC./6494/2017dismissed

Rana Singh @Rama Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2017-02-23Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.6494 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No. -34 Year- 1997 Thana -KAUAKOL District- NAWADA ====================================================== Rana Singh @ Rama Singh, S/o Shlok Singh, R/o Vill.- Kharsari, P.S. Kawakol, District - Nawada.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Amresh Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party: Mr. Ram Priya Saran Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 23-02-2017 Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for permission to make corrections in paragraph 3 of the bail petition detailing the earlier case being Kawakol P.S. Case No. 106 of 2012 in which the petitioner was an accused. It is submitted that this was missed to be stated due to sheer inadvertence and bona fide mistake. There was no intention to suppress this fact as the same finds place in the order of the learned Sessions Judge itself.

2. As prayed, learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make corrections aforesaid.

3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

4. The petitioner is in custody since 03.06.2016 in connection with Kawakol P.S. Case No. 34 of 1997 for the offences alleged under Sections 147, 148, 149 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

5. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated owing to past enmity between the parties.

6. The present application arises out of an FIR registered as far back as in the year 1997. Charge sheet was submitted showing the petitioner as an absconder and the trial has

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6494 of 2017 (2) dt.23-02-2017 2/2 since proceeded and concluded as against other accused persons.

7. From the order of the learned Sessions Judge it appears that the petitioner is the main assailant and has fired upon the informant causing firearm injury on his back.

8. Having regard to the nature of accusations and gravity of offence alleged, this Court is not inclined to grant the privilege of bail to the petitioner. The bail petition stands dismissed.

(Vikash Jain, J) B.T/Chandran U T