Anandi Goswami @ Anand Goswami @ Anandiya Goswami v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.19419 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -27 Year- 2016 Thana -BHAGALPUR GRP CASE DistrictBHAGALPUR ====================================================== Anandi Goswami @ Anand Goswami @ Anandiya Goswami, Son of Ramanand Goswami, resident of Village- Janidih (Ghogha), P.S.- Kahalgaon, District- Bhagalpur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Davendra Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Amrendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 10-05-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner wants to renew the prayer for bail which was earlier rejected by order dated 22.09.2016 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 37922 of 2016 on the ground that the petitioner is suffering in custody since 06.04.2016, the trial has not been concluded within six months as per order of this Court and the Court is vacant and only three prosecution witnesses have been examined. The learned A.P.P. submits that the petitioner has remained in custody for considerable period.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.19419 of 2017 (2) dt.10-05-2017 2/2 bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned 4th A.D.J., Bhagalpur in connection with S.T. No. 382 of 2016 arising out of Bhagalpur G.R.P. Case No. 27 of 2016, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) BTiwary/- U T