Ajay Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51728 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-110 Year-2023 Thana- HARPUR District- Munger ====================================================== Ajay Yadav S/o Grish Yadav R/o Village- Belbihma, PS- Harpur, Distt - Munger ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Shivendra Kumar Sinha, Advocate Mr. Ranjeet Patel, Advocate Mr. Divit Vinod, Advocate Mr. Avnish Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ram Naresh Ray, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY ORAL ORDER 12-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 447, 337, 325, 307, 427, 379, 504, 506, and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per the prosecution case, the named accused persons including the petitioner assaulted the uncle of the informant by means of iron-rod causing him head injury. It is further alleged that other co-accused persons had also assaulted the informant on his wrist and snatched away gold chain etc.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the case
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51728 of 2025(2) dt.12-08-2025 2/3 on account of some civil dispute which is pending between the parties and even from perusal of the FIR, it would appear that the petitioner is said to have assaulted one Raghunandan Yadav on his head, however, from the perusal of the injury report, brought on record by way of Annexure-2, it would be found that the injuries sustained were simple in nature. It has lastly been submitted that the petitioner carries clean antecedent.
5. The learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.
6. Considering the aforesaid submissions, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Harpur P.S. Case No. 110 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure read with corresponding Section 482(2) of BNSS as well as subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be his
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51728 of 2025(2) dt.12-08-2025 3/3 close relative.
(ii) The petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each date of the trial.
(iii) In case of absence on two consecutive dates, or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of the petitioner will be liable to be cancelled by the Court concerned.
(iv) If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature of offence in future, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of his bail bond.
(v) The learned Court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.
7. Accordingly, the prayer for bail is allowed. (Sourendra Pandey, J) Siwani/- U T