Dr. Md. Wasimul Haque v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2281 of 2023 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3081 of 2023 ====================================================== Dr. Md. Wasimul Haque Son of Late Md. Waizul Haque, Resident of Mohalla-Road No. 22, Aliganj, Near Masjid, Police Station-Chandauti, District-Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Bihar, Patna.

2.

Sri Deepak Kumar Jha, the Principal Secretary, Department of Education (Higher), Bihar, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

Mr. Sanjay Kumar, The Secretary, Department of Education Higher, Bihar, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4.

Dr. Shashi Pratap Sahi, the Vice Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, District-Gaya.

5.

Dr. Shamir Kumar Sharma, The Registrar, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, District-Gaya.

6.

Mr. Indra Kumar Singh, The Finance Officer, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, District-Gaya.

7.

Dr. Sujeet Ali Khan, the Principal/Professor Incharge of Mirza Galib Galib College, Gaya.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Virendra Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Prabhakar Jha (GP-27) For the University :

Mr. Amitabh Sohan, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-04-2024 Heard Mr. Virendra Prasad, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner; Mr. Prabhakar Jha, learned GP-27 appearing on behalf of the State and Mr. Amitabh Sohan, learned counsel for the Magadh University.

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner informs that though the substantial amount under

Patna High Court MJC No.2281 of 2023(8) dt.10-04-2024 2/2 different heads of the retiral dues has been paid to the petitioner but the up-to-date interest has not been calculated, the petitioner has not been provided with the calculation chart and the representation of the petitioner has also not been considered and disposed of.

3. Considering the aforesaid information that the substantial amount of retiral dues under different heads has been paid to the petitioner, I am of the opinion that the Finance Officer and the Registrar of the University must ensure to make payment of the remaining amount after calculating the interest and dispose of the representation, which has been filed by the petitioner, which is still pending, after giving calculation chart, so that the petitioner may get satisfied.

4. With the above observation/direction, the present contempt petition is disposed of.

(Purnendu Singh, J) Niraj/- U