Nitin Paswan @ Nitin Prakash v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54216 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-218 Year-2022 Thana- SAHPUR District- Patna ====================================================== 1.

NITIN PASWAN @ NITIN PRAKASH Son of Paras Kumar Resident of Village - Raghurampur Chandmari, P.s.- Shahpur, Distt.- Patna. 2.

Anand Paswan @ Anand Prakash Son of Paras Kumar Resident of Village - Raghurampur Chandmari, P.s.- Shahpur, Distt.- Patna. 3.

Sunny Kumar Son of Vinod Paswan Resident of Village - Raghurampur Chandmari, P.s.- Shahpur, Distt.- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 22-12-2022 At the outset of argument learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail petition of petitioner No. 3.

Prayer is allowed.

This anticipatory bail petition is dismissed as withdrawn against petitioner No.3.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners No. 1 & 2 and the State.

Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 307, 354(B), 379 and some other ancillary Sections of the Indian Penal Code. As per the prosecution case, all the 16 FIR named accused persons including these petitioners assaulted the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54216 of 2022(2) dt.22-12-2022 2/2 informant and three others as a result of which they sustained injuries.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the case. Both parties are neighbours and on account of petty dispute the scuffle took place. There is case and counter case. Injuries caused by the petitioners are found to be simple in nature. Petitioners have got clean antecedent. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Considering the facts of the case and clean antecedent of the petitioners, let the petitioners No. 1 & 2, above named, in the event of their arrest/ surrender within a period of six weeks from today shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial MagistrateI, Danapur, Patna in connection with Shahpur PS case No. 218/ 2022, subject to conditions laid down u/s 438(2) of the Cr. P. C. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) BKS/- U T