Ravindra Prasad @ Ravindra Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51925 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-252 Year-2019 Thana- HILSA District- Nalanda ====================================================== RAVINDRA PRASAD @ RAVINDRA KUMAR S/o Janki Prasad Resident of Village- Chamarbigha, P.S.- Hilsa, District- Nalanda. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajeev Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dilip Kumar No. 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 27-09-2019 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Hilsa P.S. Case No. 252 of 2019, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 302, 120(B)/201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The allegation is regarding the accused persons having some dispute with the father of the informant regarding money transaction since the father of the informant was a property dealer. It is alleged by the informant that his father was called by the co-accused persons, namely, Jitendra Kumar and Rajesh Kumar for the purposes of going to village Reri and thereafter, they had left the village on motorcycle, however, in the morning, the dead body of the father of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51925 of 2019(3) dt.27-09-2019 2/2 informant was recovered. It is alleged that the accused persons had hatched a conspiracy and killed his father. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that even if the F.I.R. in question is to be believed, there is no whisper that the petitioner had either called the father of the informant and accompanied him on the motorcycle, out of the village, hence, apparently, there is no complicity of the petitioner in the instant case. The petitioner is having a clean antecedent and he is languishing in custody since 19.6.2019. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it fit and proper to enlarge the petitioner on regular bail.

Accordingly, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-1, Hilsa, Nalanda in connection with Hilsa P.S. Case No. 252 of 2019. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) ajay gupta/- U T