Anil Yadav @ Sonu v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54618 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-79 Year-2017 Thana- NAGARNAUSA District- Nalanda ====================================================== Anil Yadav @ Sonu S/o Rabindra Prasad @ Rabindar Yadav, Resident of Village- Bhadru Dih, P.S- Nagarnausa, Distt.- Nalanda. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Lalan Kumar, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 23-08-2023 No one appears on behalf of petitioner, however, learned A.P.P. for the State is present.

2. From the document of the present Cr. Misc. Application, it transpires that petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Nagarnausa P.S. Case No.79 of 2017 dated 15.07.2017, lodged under Section 302/201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per prosecution case, the F.I.R. has been lodged by the informant against five named accused persons with allegation that they have killed her sister.

4. Learned A.P.P. for the State submits that the F.I.R. has been filed by the informant alleging therein that the marriage of his cousin sister was solemnized with the petitioner 11 years back and from the deceased, the petitioner has two

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54618 of 2023(2) dt.23-08-2023 2/2 child. He further submits that the informant received information that her sister was killed at the instance of petitioner and her family members, in which the petitioner being the husband who seeks anticipatory bail.

5. In the present facts and circumstances and the submissions made above, this Court is not inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in connection with Nagarnausa P.S. Case No.79 of 2017 to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-1st, Hilsa.

6. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner stands rejected.

7. However, the learned Court below shall consider the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner, if the petitioner surrenders within a period of four weeks.

8. The present order shall not cause any prejudice to the petitioner.

(Dr. Anshuman, J.) Ritik/- U T