← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./15719/2013dismissed

Surendra Pratap Singh @ Surendra Singh And ANR v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2017-02-13Mr. Justice Rajendra Kumar Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.15719 of 2013 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -447 Year- 2011 Thana -KHAZANIHAT District- PURNIA ======================================================

1. Surendra Pratap Singh @ Surendra Singh Son Of Late Navin Singh Resident Of Mohalla- Subhash Nagar, Police Station- Khajanchi Hat, District- Purnia

2. Manoj Kumar Uraon Son Of Late Ramanand Uraon Resident Of Village- Dalia Husainabad, Police Station- Sadar Muffasil(Ranipatra), District- Purnia .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. Koma Uraon Son Of Late Bauka Uraon Resident Of Mohalla- Maharaji Hata, Gumati No.-3, Police Station- Khajanchi Hat, District- Purnia .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.R. Kr. Choudhary. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Satyavrat Verma (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 13-02-2017 Heard.

2. This application, filed on behalf of the petitioners, under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, is directed against the order dated 21.11.2012 passed in K.Hat P.S. Case No.447 of 2011 whereunder the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnia, took cognizance of the offence under Sections 419, 420, 463, 468, 471, 120 B/34 of the Indian Penal Code against the accused named in the F.I.R. including the petitioners on perusal of the case diary.

3. On going through the impugned order, I find

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.15719 of 2013 (4) dt.13-02-2017 2/2 no illegality therein amounting to abuse of the process of the court for interfering with the same in an extraordinary jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of this Court.

4. Accordingly, this application stands dismissed. However, the petitioners would be at liberty to raise their points, as raised herein, in the trial at the appropriate Stage. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) AnilKrSinha/- U T