Ravi @ Ravi Yadav @ Kavit Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64134 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-86 Year-2021 Thana- JAGDISHPUR District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== RAVI @ RAVI YADAV @ KAVIT YADAV Son of Yogendra Yadav Resident of Nurdinpur, Police Station - Jagdishpur, District - Bhagalpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Dr. Manoj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH ORAL ORDER 16-06-2022 The learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove all the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter within one month.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Jagdishpur P.S. Case no. 86 of 2021 registered under sections 302, 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code as well as section 27 of the Arms Act.

The main submission advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner is that there is no allegation against the petitioner except confessional statement of co-accused Gautam Kumar and during course of investigation, one witness namely, Asha Devi, who is stated to be neighbour of the deceased

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64134 of 2021(2) dt.16-06-2022 2/2 persons, deposed her statement before the police in which she did not whisper any word showing involvement of the petitioner in the present case.

Learned APP opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. Heard both sides, perused the FIR and annexures attached with this petition. The present case relates to murder of two persons who are stated to be parents of co-accused Gottam Kumar and as per FIR said co-accused initially contacted the petitioner to kill his parents but later on, he took pistol from the petitioner and murdered his father and mother also, the petitioner is alleged to have helped the main accused in committing murder of two persons and the case is under investigation.

Considering all these facts, it is not fit case for anticipatory bail and accordingly, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner stands rejected.

(Shailendra Singh, J) s.hassan/- U T