Md. Irfan @ Md. Irfan Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54281 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-288 Year-2022 Thana- CHAKIA District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.

MD. IRFAN @ MD. IRFAN ANSARI Son of Late Md. Jan Anshari Residence of Vill.- Hussaini (Uttari) Tola - Jalwa Toli, P.S.- Dumariya Ghat, District - East Champaran at Motihari.

2.

Abdul Hanan Son of Late Md. Jan Anshari Residence of Vill.- Hussaini (Uttari) Tola - Jalwa Toli, P.S.- Dumariya Ghat, District - East Champaran at Motihari.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Binay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dilip Kumar No.1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 15-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 504, 506, 186, 189 and 353 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioners is that they have abuse the informant in the office.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that petitioner no.1 has gone to the office of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54281 of 2022(2) dt.15-12-2022 2/2 Anchaladhikari for the purpose of land mutation who case number is 1369R27/2019-20 but Anchaladhikari/informant put his case pending for three years and demanded Rs.10,000/- for petitioner no.1. He further submits that he refuse to give the bribe to inform due to which the informant has filed the present case against the petitioners. He submits that there is no specific overt act against the petitioners. He further submits that petitioner no.1 have got one and petitioner no.2 have no got criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Chakiya P.S. Case No. 288/2022, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.