Dinesh Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.10181 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -739 Year- 2016 Thana -NAWADA District- NAWADA ====================================================== Dinesh Prasad, son of Janakdhari Prasad, resident of Village- Upraura, P.S.- Bihar, District- Nalanda.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sudish Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Ashlam Ansari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 03-03-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

This is an application for bail in connection with Nawada (Town) P.S.Case No. 739 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that except confessional statement of co-accused there is nothing against the petitioner and he is in custody for more than two months having clean antecedent.

Heard learned APP also.

Having heard both sides and considering the fact that petitioner has clean antecedent languishing in custody for more than two months and except confessional statement of co-accused there is nothing against him, let the petitioner, above named, be

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.10181 of 2017 (2) dt.03-03-2017 2/2 released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada, in connection with Nawada (Town) P.S.Case No. 739 of 2016, subject to the conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move the cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U