Pawan Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59456 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-181 Year-2024 Thana- BELDOUR District- Khagaria ====================================================== Pawan Singh Son Of Late Adhik Lal Singh R/V- Village- Telihar, P.S.- Beldaur, Distt.- Khagaria ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Anuj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Surendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 26-10-2024 1.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 304 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of three cases and the informant alleges that petitioner took her husband to Andhra Pradesh about 7 months back for the purposes of work. It is next alleged that on 25-3-2024, the husband of the informant died and his body was sent home by an ambulance, further co-workers, Lalo Chaudhary and Rames Chaudhary, informed that petitioner used to take hectic work from the informant's husband due to which his health deteriorated and he became ill and petitioner did not
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59456 of 2024(3) dt.26-10-2024 2/3 get the husband of the informant treated on account of which he died.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant at the behest of Lalo and Ramesh Chaudhary. It is also submitted that had the health condition of the husband of the informant deteriorated to an extent where he was not able to render work in that event he would have informed the informant, but from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that the same is not the case. It is further submitted that husband of the informant died his natural death. It is also submitted that petitioner will not abscond rather will cooperate in the investigation to prove his innocence. 5.
Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
6.
Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59456 of 2024(3) dt.26-10-2024 3/3 is pending/successor court in connection with Beldaur P.S. Case No. 181 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
7.
However, it is made clear that in the event, if the Investigating Officer of the case files an application before the learned trial court bringing to its notice that the petitioner, despite giving assurance to this Court, is not cooperating in the investigation or is not presenting himself as and when required, the learned trial court shall be at liberty to forthwith cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner after recording reasons. 8.
Let a copy of this order be sent to the concerned police station through the learned Trial Court. (Satyavrat Verma, J) SUMIT/- U T