Sanjay Ram v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.23429 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -65 Year- 2017 Thana -KORMA District- SEKHPURA ====================================================== Sanjay Ram, Son of Late Naurangi Ram, Resident of Village- Gadbadiya, Police Station- Korma, District- Sheikhpura.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bipin Kumar, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ramchandra Sahani ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 20-04-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Korma P.S. Case No. 65 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Section 366/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 8 of POCSO Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that there is no specific allegation of kidnapping against the petitioner. In the written report it is alleged that this petitioner and another co-accused Ravi Ram took the daughter of the informant in car.
The statement of victim girl has been recorded under Section 164 Cr. P.C., copy of which, has been enclosed as Annexure-2 wherein the girl has stated that she has voluntarily gone with Ravi Ram and has performed marriage with him on
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23429 of 2018 (2) dt.20-04-2018 2/2 07.02.2018.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Korma P.S. Case No. 65 of 2017, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 1st Additional District & Sessions Judge, Sheikhpura, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C.
with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel his bail bond and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J) S.