Sonelal Kumar @ Bala v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53629 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-98 Year-2025 Thana- TARARI District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Sonelal Kumar @ Bala S/o Dudh Nath Ram @ Dudh Nath Paswan R/o Village- Kusumhi, Police Station- Tarari, District- Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anil Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 20-08-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 109 and 351 of the BNS.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on 24.05.2025 at 04:30 p.m. his son had gone to purchase some article when petitioner assaulted him by an iron rod causing injury on his head.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is further submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that informant himself alleges that a previous dispute had arisen in between the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53629 of 2025(2) dt.20-08-2025 2/2 petitioner and the informant when a calf of the informant's pattidar was hit by a tractor and the petitioner had taken side of the driver of the tractor which had led to an altercation with the informant. It is next submitted that the injury has been opined to be simple in nature which amply demonstrates that petitioner never had any intention of committing a serious occurrence. It is also submitted that petitioner is not the criminal.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Tarari P.S. Case No. 98 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T