Patna High CourtCR. MISC./13186/2017bail granted

Ramlala Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2017-03-29Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13186 of 2017 (2) dt.29-03-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.13186 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -93 Year- 2002 Thana -BARAHIYA District- LAKHISARAI ====================================================== Ramlala Singh, son of late Kailash Singh, resident of Village- Barahiya, Ramcharan Tola (Madhuban), P.S. Barahiya, District- Lakhisarai. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Ambika Bhagat, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 29-03-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 16.01.2017 in connection with Barahiya P.S. Case No. 93 of 2002 for the offences alleged under Sections 324, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and in any event the accusation of firing is on coaccused Ravindra Singh and Gopal Singh. No overt act has been alleged against the petitioner.

4. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-III, Lakhisarai, in

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13186 of 2017 (2) dt.29-03-2017 connection with Barahiya P.S. Case No. 93 of 2002, on the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial. (iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(iv) The petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Vikash Jain, J) Md. Ibrarul/psc U T