Raghubanshmani Prasad Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7641 of 2014 ====================================================== Raghubanshmani Prasad Singh son of Late Muneshwar Singh R/o Village + P.O. Rana Bigha, P.S. Rana Bigha, P.S. Barh, Distt. Patna .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Director, Panchayat Raj, Rural Development Deptt. Bihar, Patna

2. The Commissioner, Patna Division, Patna

3. The Distt. Magistrate, Patna

4. The Block Development Officer, Masaurhi, Distt. - Patna

5. The Treasury Officer, Barh, Distt. Patna

6. The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ga8-Sandeep Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA ORAL ORDER 22-10-2016 Heard.

The petitioner has invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court for directing the respondents to pay the pensionary benefits and the difference of pay scale to the petitioner. In the counter affidavit, it has been mentioned that entire retirement benefits, i.e., pension, gratuity, leave encashment, group insurance including all salary for different periods and difference of arrears of salary on the basis of 6th pay revision amounting to Rs.83558/- has been paid. Such assertions have been made in the counter affidavit filed on 21.01.2015. There is no rejoinder affidavit filed to the said counter affidavit nor the counsel for the petitioner is

Patna High Court CWJC No.7641 of 2014 (2) dt.22-10-2016 2/2 present.

Considering the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is disposed of as infructuous.

(Hemant Gupta, J) B.Kr./- U