Gautam Prasad v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15754 of 2015 ======================================================
1. Gautam Prasad son of Late Rangeela Sah, resident of village + P.O.- Mahmada Bazar, P.S.- Bhagwanpur Hat, District- Siwan .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna
2. The Director, Higher Secondary Education, Bihar, Patna
3. The District Magistrate, Siwan
4. The District Education Officer, Siwan
5. The Bihar School Examination Board (Higher Secondary), Patna through its Secretary
6. The Chairman, Bihar School Examination Board (Senior Secondary), Patna
7. The Secretary, Bihar School Examination Board (Senior Secondary), Patna
8. Shiv Kumar Prasad, son of Late Yadu Sah, resident of village- Murwar, P.S.- Basantpur, District- Siwan, at present Principal, Mahmada Inter College, Mahmada, P.O. Mahmada Bazar, P.S. Bhagwanpur, District Siwan .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Roy Shivaji Nath, AAG-3 For Respondent Nos.5 to 7: Mr. Satyabir Bharti, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ) 01-04-2016 Heard Mr. Umesh Kumar Mishra, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. Roy Shivaji Nath, learned Additional Advocate General No.3, appearing on behalf of the Staterespondents. Heard also Mr. Satyabir Bharti, learned Counsel, appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.5 to 7. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to
Patna High Court CWJC No.15754 of 2015 (2) dt.01-04-2016 2/2 withdraw this application with liberty to approach this Court with appropriate application in future.
No objection has been raised to the prayer for withdrawal made by the petitioner.
In view of the above and in the interest of justice, the application is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach this Court with appropriate application, in future, if so advised, and/or to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible.
(I.A. Ansari, ACJ) (Anjana Mishra, J) Mkr./- U