Sanjay Yadav @ Sanjay Kumar And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.47879 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -176 Year- 2016 Thana -SURYAGARHA District- LAKHISARAI ======================================================
1. Sanjay Yadav @ Sanjay Kumar.
2. Suraj Yadav @ Suryakant Kumar @ Suraj Kumar. Both are sons of Asharfi Yadav.
3. Asharfi Yadav, Son of Panchu Yadav.
4. Sandeep Kumar, son of Jivnandan Yadav. All are resident of VillageChandanpur, P.S.- Surajgarha, District- Lakhisarai. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ambika Bhagat For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Kumar Virendra Narayan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER 08-12-2016 Heard both sides.
The petitioners pray for grant of anticipatory bail in Surajgarha P.S. Case No. 176 of 2016 registered under Sections 307, 337 and other allied Sections of the Indian Penal Code. The accused(s) persons cited in the First Information Report intruded into the house of the informant with various weapons and started assaulting. When his father and mother came to rescue, they were also severely assaulted. Another person came to their rescue who was also assaulted.
Contention of the petitioners is that owing to land dispute, the present occurrence had taken place as is embedded in the First
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47879 of 2016 (3) dt.08-12-2016 2/2 Information Report itself. There is counter version also in the shape of First Information Report (annexure-2), in which injuries sustained by the present prosecution side. The injury on the person of the informant is simple.
Learned counsel for the informant, on the other hand, submits that mother and father of the informant have received serious injury inasmuch as they were referred to the hospital for specialized treatment.
Looking to the allegation and other materials reflected from the records, in my view, it is not fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. Their prayer is rejected.
The petitioners may surrender and pray for regular bail. If they do so, the same shall be considered and disposed by the court below on its own merit in accordance with law. (Kishore Kumar Mandal, J) rohit/- U T